Skip to main content

China-US ties have arrived at unexpected low

Photo: GT
It is beyond anyone's expectation that China-US relations have become what they are today. China is being squeezed by the US-the world's most developed nation, and some Western countries have also been mobilized in varying degrees by Washington to lay siege to China. This brings a very bad feeling to the Chinese society. Some Chinese intellectuals may wonder if China is to blame for the subversive change in the attitude of the US toward China. Do we in China need to make major adjustments to ease the China-US relationship?

It must be said that the continuous deterioration of China-US relations is a process of interactions between these two great powers. Both sides say the other country is the reason for the worsening of their relations. However, looking at China-US relations objectively without subjective emotions, we can list the following basic facts. 

First, China is a rising developing country. So far it has not formed the strength that can pose a substantial challenge to the US, nor does China have the will to do so.

Second, the US has strategic doubts about China and China also has various expressions of its own visions. But the core of China's foreign relations is development. China's performance in what can be described as "overseas military expansion" is arguably negligible. China has been active only in areas where it has territorial disputes with its neighbors, and has generally been restrained, as evidenced by the fact that it has not had a military conflict with its neighbors in more than 30 years.

Third, China is expanding its influence through economic activities, which is a very mutually beneficial process, and it is doing so under the US-led multilateral trading system. China has not forcibly changed the rules of trade, but has accumulated a trade surplus under the current rules and with the hard work of its people.



Fourth, China's political system differs from that of the US and the West, leading to frictions between values and ideologies. But China is generally not a country that exports ideology to the outside world, and there is no attempt to subvert the Western system. In the ideological frictions between the two sides, the West is undoubtedly the aggressive, offensive side and China is on the defensive side.

Fifth, there has always been a willingness on the part of the American elites to shape China. Their anger at China's insistence on its own political path in recent years is mixed with concerns that China's growing success could undermine Western confidence. But once again, it is not China's fault. After all, China has the right to go its own way without interfering in other countries' ways of development.

Sixth, when the Trump administration launched a trade war with China, it was indeed bullying. The "America First" doctrine has caused widespread disgust around the world. China is not the only victim. Since the outbreak of the COVID-19, Washington's dumping of the blame on China has been nothing short of campaign malpractice on the part of the White House and the Republican Party for election purposes. It's a classic form of international hooliganism.

The Trump administration is rife with radical, megalomaniac Cold War thinking. They are pushing China strategically and there is virtually no place for China to make a retreat.

I know some Chinese people yearn for the old China-US relations. A good, or cooperative, relationship between China and the US has served as the foundation for the same kind of relationship between China and West in the past. It has also provided a favorable international atmosphere for China's reform and opening-up. It would be nice if we could stop the growing tensions between China and the US. 

The reality, however, is paper-thin. The US has defined China as a major strategic competitor. The price tag for ending its strategic crackdown on China is simply too high for China to accept and bear. In fact, what the US wants is China stopping growing and ensures that China adopts an attitude similar to that of Japan toward the US to completely eliminate US strategic concerns about China's rise. 

So the relationship is strained between China and the US. After China grew up, the pattern of interests in China-US relations changed. In the 1980s, China was a force that the US could use to fight against the Soviet Union. Later, as a developing country, China could provide cheap labor services to the US. The new keyword for the US to feel about China today is competition. The US attitude toward China has completely changed, and policy adjustments are inevitable.

In view of this, I think the most important thing for Chinese people to do is not to dwell on the past. The landscape of China-US relations has changed, and we need to grasp the new scenario with new wisdom and determination.

The strategic competition between China and the US will be a long process that will test China's internal unity. To improve the cohesion of Chinese society, all kinds of elites, including the intellectual elite, need to participate and make their contributions. At this moment, the elites should not be afraid of the US. Instead, they should have the courage to stand on the front line of a complex competition with the US and put in the first place the interests of the country and the interests of the Chinese nation.

We must dispel the fears of some people that Chinese society may become more conservative as a result of the growing rivalry between China and the US. While strengthening cohesion, we should create more conditions conducive to increasing the vitality of our society. This is one of the key directions to improve social confidence, and it is especially important to unite the intellectuals.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Donald Trump or Joe Biden? What will change for Asean after the US election?

https://twitter.com/mujeebsubhan786 https://web.facebook.com/mdmujeeb.subhan.5

Global coronavirus cases cross 40 million: Reuters tally

Worldwide coronavirus cases crossed 40 million on Monday, according to a Reuters tally, as the onset of winter in the northern hemisphere fuelled a resurgence in the spread of the disease. The Reuters tally is based on official reporting by individual countries. Experts believe the true numbers of both cases and deaths are likely much higher, given deficiencies in testing and potential under-reporting by some countries. The Reuters data shows the pace of the pandemic continues to pick up. It took just 32 days to go from 30 million global cases to 40 million, compared with the 38 days it took to get from 20 to 30 million, the 44 days between 10 and 20 million, and the three months it took to reach 10 million cases from when the first cases were reported in Wuhan, China, in early January. Record one-day increases in new infections were seen at the end of last week, with global coronavirus cases rising above 400,000 for the first time. There were an average of around 347,000 c...

Russia-Ukraine war reaches 100 days: By the numbers

The invasion of Ukraine has lasted 100 days, with no end yet in sight as Russia and Ukraine continue to fight for control of eastern Ukraine. Russia maintains that it is conducting a "special operation" in its neighboring country, and the "operation" has taken a significant toll on the Ukrainian people. Nearly 15 million people have reportedly fled their homes since the invasion started, according to the latest data from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). The data indicates that around 6.8 million Ukrainian residents have headed for neighboring countries while an additional (estimated) 8 million remain displaced within the country itself. The latest count shows that 3,627,178 people went to Poland, 989,357 went to Romania, 971,417 went to Russia, 682,594 went to Hungary, 479,513 went to Moldova, 461,164 went to Slovakia and 30,092 went to Belarus. Those numbers continue to climb. Most of the refugees are women and ch...